Friday, June 02, 2006

another gymnist thing

Slate Magazine: "Yes, I think you're taking it too seriously when you respond to (almost) every single post.

'Must defend gymism! Must defend gymnism against these hordes of Anglican heretics!'

I don't disagree there's a wonderful feeling. The wonderful feeling one gets in the middle of a workout (an endorphin high?). It's a feeling of power, of self-confidence, of connecting to something bigger than yourself (ie, having more power than one does). I love that feeling too.

But it's a very serious feeling, it's incompatible with humor. Humor deflates power. It's hard to laugh at yourself looking at the mirror in a gym and not lose that feeling (you will be mere dust soon enough). As it's hard to laugh in the middle of sex. Or when defending your religion.

The O'Neill article deflates an illusion (debunking's in the subtitle of the column afterall), too - that going to a gym is a morally virtuous act by pointing out that people we know are immoral, ie, the terrorists, went to the gym. The more intense they were the more often they went. There was nothing bringing their mania back to earth. No healthy self-parody. No balance. No ying to their yang. (I'd imagine a Daoist fanatic is a contradiction in terms.)


So many people in the modern world have no idea that their physical existence can be a source of pleasure or satisfaction.



Modern people hate physical pleaure. Goddam. Except for sex, food and violence (even if the last is vicarious), of course.

people don't go to the gym out of a sense of virtue or self-righteousness; they go because their lives are too stressful,



People go to church for the same reason - to relieve stress. They may say it's because they are being virtuous, God-fearing and so forth, but social animals feel good when engaging in social bonding. (Something about endorphin high, perhaps?) Quite a few gym-goers confuse the causality relationship of the two feelings as well (the two are probably in a virtuous/vicious cycle).

I know I go to the gym because I have told myself it's the right thing to do, in the long run. How else to explain my getting up out of my comfortable stress-free Sunday and going for a bike ride or a swim? Certainly lounging around reading the paper would also reduce stress. So would beer and chocolate cake. Or video games on the computer. To go to the gym I need to persuade myself there's a 'higher' or more long-term reason to go. I've had to package it in a moral rationale (by way of health/market competitiveness). Everyone does - even if the moral rationale is 'Doing what feels good, is the right thing to do.' That's still a moral statement.

(Goddam, all this introspection is going to make it hard to go to the gym tomorrow. I need my myths. Luckily the lifeguard is cute.)

The connection between British/WASPs and flabbiness eludes me, also. Didn't the British Victorians practically invent modern athletics? From golf, tennis, soccer, rugby, cricket, rowing, etc.

Maybe what pisses you off is that the British commit the heretic's worse offense -- being silly."

Thursday, June 01, 2006

Slate Magazine

Slate Magazine: "Yes, I think you're taking it too seriously when you respond to (almost) every single post.

'Must defend gymism! Must defend gymnism against these hordes of Anglican heretics!'

I don't disagree there's a wonderful feeling. The wonderful feeling one gets in the middle of a workout (an endorphin high?). It's a feeling of power, of self-confidence, of connecting to something bigger than yourself (ie, having more power than one does). I love that feeling too.

But it's a very serious feeling, it's incompatible with humor. Humor deflates power. It's hard to laugh at yourself looking at the mirror in a gym and not lose that feeling (you will be mere dust soon enough). As it's hard to laugh in the middle of sex. Or when defending your religion.

The O'Neill article deflates an illusion (debunking's in the subtitle of the column afterall), too - that going to a gym is a morally virtuous act by pointing out that people we know are immoral, ie, the terrorists, went to the gym. The more intense they were the more often they went. There was nothing bringing their mania back to earth. No healthy self-parody. No balance. No ying to their yang. (I'd imagine a Daoist fanatic is a contradiction in terms.)


So many people in the modern world have no idea that their physical existence can be a source of pleasure or satisfaction.



Modern people hate physical pleaure. Goddam. Except for sex, food and violence (even if the last is vicarious), of course.

people don't go to the gym out of a sense of virtue or self-righteousness; they go because their lives are too stressful,



People go to church for the same reason - to relieve stress. They may say it's because they are being virtuous, God-fearing and so forth, but social animals feel good when engaging in social bonding. (Something about endorphin high, perhaps?) Quite a few gym-goers confuse the causality relationship of the two feelings as well (the two are probably in a virtuous/vicious cycle).

I know I go to the gym because I have told myself it's the right thing to do, in the long run. How else to explain my getting up out of my comfortable stress-free Sunday and going for a bike ride or a swim? Certainly lounging around reading the paper would also reduce stress. So would beer and chocolate cake. Or video games on the computer. To go to the gym I need to persuade myself there's a 'higher' or more long-term reason to go. I've had to package it in a moral rationale (by way of health/market competitiveness). Everyone does - even if the moral rationale is 'Doing what feels good, is the right thing to do.' That's still a moral statement.

(Goddam, all this introspection is going to make it hard to go to the gym tomorrow. I need my myths. Luckily the lifeguard is cute.)

The connection between British/WASPs and flabbiness eludes me, also. Didn't the British Victorians practically invent modern athletics? From golf, tennis, soccer, rugby, cricket, rowing, etc.

Maybe what pisses you off is that the British commit the heretic's worse offense -- being silly."

Slate Magazine

Slate Magazine: "I read the same article and I didn't get the gym-hating tone you're alluding to. Sure it was prickly, but it was supposed to prick some sort of CW - that gyms are morally virtuous. I guess it worked as you came out swinging in defense.

You're taking it far too seriously. As if your God/ritual/community/symbol had been insultingly drawn in a cartoon. Or made the villain of a popular book/movie starring Tom Hanks. Which proves the author's point, no?

Yes, he did call gym goers preening and narcissistic, but is it that particularly inaccurate? I started a gym regimen a few months ago, and I can definitely attest to looking in the mirror far more often (what can I say, it's a beautiful sight!) - must have done it three times today already. And preening? Well, that's what's it's called when one takes the long way around the pool when the teenage lifeguard and her friend are chatting over on the other side as I did this morning (laughs at self).

I don't think narcissistic and selfless are polar opposites anyway. People are social animals who live under the gaze of others. Abstract away the social context in one way (the agency of the others), and one gets the extreme of just gazing, ie, narcissism. Abstract away the social context in a dfferent way (their physicality), and one gets the extreme of just judging, ie, asceticism and aestheticism.

Self-idolatry and self-immolation are the Scylla and Charbdis of a certain personality type, those that are too viable to abstract social contexts. Mysticism tries to tame the excesses of the first. When it overreaches, it veers into those of second."

NPR : Summer's Here: Grills Catch Fire

NPR : Summer's Here: Grills Catch Fire: "Grilled Tuna Steaks with Summer Salsa

Serves 4

5 plum tomatoes, halved lengthwise, seeded and coarsely chopped

2 chopped scallions (all but 2 inches of the green)

1 medium clove garlic, peeled and minced

1/2 cup olive oil

3 tablespoons chopped fresh cilantro

1 cup chopped basil leaves

1 tablespoon lemon juice

1/2 jalapeno pepper or other hot chili, seeded and minced (or to taste)

Salt and freshly ground pepper to taste

4 tuna steaks, about 8 ounces each, about 1-inch thick

2 tablespoons olive oil

Coarse sea salt to taste

The Salsa:

In a bowl, combine chopped tomatoes, green onions, garlic, 1/2 cup olive oil, cilantro, basil, lemon juice and jalapeno. Season with salt and pepper. Best if refrigerated for an hour or more, then taste again.

The Tuna:

Coat the tuna steaks with 2 tablespoons olive oil and season well with sea salt and freshly ground black pepper. (Remove fish from refrigerator about 10 minutes before grilling; it should not be cooked icy cold.)

Grill tuna steaks about 6 inches from the heat, about 4 to 6 minutes per side, depending on thickness. (Check by making a thin incision in a thick part of the flesh). Remove before they reach desired doneness because they will continue to cook a bit."

NPR : Summer's Here: Grills Catch Fire

NPR : Summer's Here: Grills Catch Fire: "Spice-Rubbed Flank Steak with Cajun Swamp Sauce

Hanger steak also is excellent prepared this way.

2 medium garlic cloves

1 1/2 teaspoons grated fresh ginger

1 teaspoon salt

1 teaspoon black mustard seeds (optional)

1 teaspoon ground cinnamon

1 teaspoon ground coriander

1/2 teaspoon black pepper, or to taste

1/2 teaspoon ground cumin

1/2 teaspoon cayenne (optional)

1 1/2 pounds flank steak, trimmed of excess fat

With a mortar and pestle, mash the garlic and ginger into a paste. (You can use a flat meat pounder or mince very well with a large chef's knife). Add the remaining seasonings. Salt to taste.

Pat the steaks dry with paper towels. Rub the paste all over. Cover in plastic wrap and marinate steak for about 5 hours or, better, overnight.

Oil the grill grates. When the grill is hot, cook the steak for 5 to 8 minutes on each side for medium-rare (depending on thickness). Test with a meat thermometer -- 145 rare, 160 medium. Transfer steak to a cutting board and let stand 10 minutes.

With a very sharp knife slice the steak thinly with the grain and serve."

NPR : Summer's Here: Grills Catch Fire

NPR : Summer's Here: Grills Catch Fire: "I asked him to identify the three most common errors committed by amateur grill cooks.

'Number one is overcrowding the grill,' he said. 'The second is confusing burning food with cooking food -- that's where direct and indirect cooking comes in.'

Number three: 'You should not put on barbecue sauce too early, only in the last few minutes of cooking,' he advised, noting that this is particularly critical with a sauce that contains sugar. 'It'll burn right up.'

Because grilling is a dry-cooking method that extracts water from foods, marinades are beneficial for their moistening and flavoring effects. Contrary to widespread belief, a vinegar-based marinade does not tenderize a steak any more than Kool-Aid does because it barely penetrates the surface. The same is true with seafood. In fact, it generally is not a good idea to marinate fish or shellfish for more than half an hour because the acid can make the surface gray and mushy.

At this time of year, simple marinades can be assembled in minutes using fresh herbs, vinegar, olive oil, lemon, wine, even beer (it's great with shellfish)."

NPR : Summer's Here: Grills Catch Fire

NPR : Summer's Here: Grills Catch Fire: "So, assume you have a shiny new grill. How do you get the best from it? Here are a few pointers:

· Maintain your grill as you would a new car -- well, as some of you would. Keep it clean, both inside (especially the cooking grates) and out, so it doesn't discolor.

· Grilling is more than just dropping food onto a flame and joining the volleyball game for 10 minutes. Some foods benefit from the 'direct heat, indirect heat' treatment. For example, a thick steak should be placed over the hottest part of the fire until it chars and develops a nice crust, then moved to a burner on a lower setting to continue cooking without burning. Most medium to large gas grills have two adjustable burners, one left, one right. If using charcoal or wood, move the food to the perimeter of the grate where the heat is less intense. Flip the steak and repeat. Cuts of meat 3/4-inch thick and thinner do not have to be moved because they cook quickly.

· Use long tongs to grasp food and rely on a meat thermometer. Experienced cooks know how to judge the doneness of a steak or thick filet of tuna by pressing them with their fingers. Amateurs should not try to show off this way -- it's safer and more accurate to use a thermometer. Steaks are rare at 145 degrees Fahrenheit, medium at about 160 degrees. Since meat and seafood continue to cook a minute or two after they are pulled from the heat, remove them a minute or so early to assure desired level of doneness.

· Let the meat rest. Sometimes when I am grilling, shortly before the food is cooked, I find myself surrounded by a wolf pack of hungry eaters. Don't give in to the rabble-rousers. When a steak is removed from the fire, it definitely needs a few minutes of downtime for the juices to redistribute."

Slate Magazine

Slate Magazine: "If we can create 'fine tuned' manufactured foods then we could mass produce celebritys for consumption in another way. 'Give me a pound of Oprah and some Paris Hilton for desert...' If you were a particularly delicious person you could get rich on the property rights to your own flesh (though the law will no doubt ensure that big corporations get 'first bite')."

Tuesday, May 30, 2006

Arguments for the Existence of God

Arguments for the Existence of God: "“... a little philosophy inclineth man’s mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men’s minds about to religion.” [Francis Bacon, “Of Atheism” in A S Gaye (ed) Bacon’s Essays, Oxford University Press (1911), p59]"

Saturday, May 27, 2006

Slate - The Dismal Science - Aug. 13, 1998

Slate - The Dismal Science - Aug. 13, 1998: "Now what happened in the Sweeneys' co-op was that, for complicated reasons involving the collection and use of dues (paid in scrip), the number of coupons in circulation became quite low. As a result, most couples were anxious to add to their reserves by baby-sitting, reluctant to run them down by going out. But one couple's decision to go out was another's chance to baby-sit; so it became difficult to earn coupons. Knowing this, couples became even more reluctant to use their reserves except on special occasions, reducing baby-sitting opportunities still further."

Friday, May 26, 2006

Where Fat Is Problem, Heredity Is the Answer, Studies Find - New York Times

Where Fat Is Problem, Heredity Is the Answer, Studies Find - New York Times: "''If you are one of those people who cannot lose weight on a relatively low-calorie diet, it means that you are efficient in storing energy,'' he said. ''That leaves you only two ways out. One is to increase your energy expenditure through exercise. The other is to reduce the proportion of fat in your diet.''"

Where Fat Is Problem, Heredity Is the Answer, Studies Find - New York Times

Where Fat Is Problem, Heredity Is the Answer, Studies Find - New York Times: "''If you are one of those people who cannot lose weight on a relatively low-calorie diet, it means that you are efficient in storing energy,'' he said. ''That leaves you only two ways out. One is to increase your energy expenditure through exercise. The other is to reduce the proportion of fat in your diet.''"

NPR : Mussels Made Easy

NPR : Mussels Made Easy: "Mussels Primer

1. Always buy mussels as close as possible to when you'll cook them, but definitely the same day.

2. Mussels should be closed the way my daughter's mouth is closed when her pediatrician wants to look in her throat -- except that mussels don't have hands they can also clamp over their faces.

3. Put the closed mussels in a large pot. Throw out any that are cracked, broken or gaping wide. Set aside in a large bowl any that are open, but still questionable.

4. The bag my mussels came in suggested 'lightly tapping' the slightly open ones. Instead, shake and swirl the lot of them in the bowl, pretty aggressively, for about 30 seconds. A number of them will have closed up again (in fear, I'm guessing). Rinse these, then throw them into the cooking pot. The rest, throw away.

5. When it comes to cleaning the little guys, there are a couple things to think about. First, even though most mussels these days are cultivated (and not wild), they're still sandy. You can scrub them under running water, or you can fill a bowl with clean water and swirl them around in there; dump the water out and repeat one more time or until most of the grit is gone.

Also, remember mussels die in fresh water, so don't soak them to get them even cleaner. My friend says he'd rather cook live mussels with a bit of sand than dead ones without.

6. As for the 'beard,' it's a little tuft of fuzzy 'hair' emerging from the inside of the shell, kind of like a mollusk soul patch. Harden your heart, take a deep breath and yank it out with your fingers or a paring knife. You probably won't get every single last bit, but then these are animals of the wild. It's all right.

7. Finally, when looking to see if the mussels are done cooking, think 'baby opening its mouth for milk,' not 'toddler eating spinach.' In other words, they should be more than just a little open. They should be yawning."

NPR : Mussels Made Easy

NPR : Mussels Made Easy: "Moules Normandes by Anthony Bourdain

Serves four as a main course.

1/4 pound slab bacon, cut into 1/2-inch cubes

4 tablespoons butter

1 shallot, thinly sliced

6 small white mushrooms, thinly sliced

1/2 apple, cored, peeled and cut into small dice or chunks

3 ounces good calvados

1 cup heavy cream

Salt and pepper

6 pounds mussels, scrubbed and debearded (just before cooking)

In a small pot, cook the bacon over medium-high heat until the meat is brown and the fat has been rendered, about 10 minutes, stirring occasionally to avoid sticking. Discard the fat and reserve the meat.

In a large pot, heat the butter until it foams. Add the shallot and cook until soft, about 3 minutes. Add the mushrooms and the apple and cook for 5 minutes, then stir in the calvados, scraping the bottom of the pot with a wooden spoon to dislodge any good brown stuff that might be clinging there. Stir in the cream and season with salt and pepper.

Once the mixture has come to a boil, add the mussels and cover. Cook for 10 minutes, or until all of the mussels have opened. Shake. Add the cooked bacon to the mussels. Cook for another minute. Shake again. Serve immediately."

Monday, May 22, 2006

folderol. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000.

folderol. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000.: "folderol

SYLLABICATION: fol·de·rol
PRONUNCIATION: fld-rl
VARIANT FORMS: also fal·de·ral ( fld-rl)
NOUN: 1. Foolishness; nonsense. 2. A trifle; a gewgaw.
ETYMOLOGY: From a nonsense refrain in some old songs."

Munchhausen-Trilemma - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Munchhausen-Trilemma - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: "# All justifications in pursuit of certain knowledge have also to justify the means of their justification and doing so they have to justify anew the means of their justification. Therefore there can be no end. We are faced with the hopeless situation of 'infinite regression'.
# One can stop at self-evidence or common sense or fundamental principles or speaking 'ex cathedra' or at any other evidence, but in doing so the intention to install certain justification is abandoned.
# The third horn of the trilemma is the application of a circular and therefore invalid argument."

History of liberal thought - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

History of liberal thought - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: "As Isaiah Berlin said, 'Freedom for the wolves means death for the sheep.'"

Essays (Montaigne) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Essays (Montaigne) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: "We cannot trust our reasoning because thoughts just occur to us: we don't truly control them."

Johann Gottlieb Fichte - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Johann Gottlieb Fichte - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: "Fichte did not endorse Kant's argument for the existence of noumena, of 'things in themselves', the super-sensible reality beyond the categories of human reason. Fichte saw the rigorous and systematic separation of 'things in themselves' (noumena) and things 'as they appear to us' (phenomena) as an invitation to skepticism.

Rather than invite such skepticism, Fichte made the radical suggestion that we should throw out the notion of a noumenal world and instead accept the fact that consciousness does not have a grounding in a so-called 'real world'. In fact, Fichte achieved fame for originating the argument that consciousness is not grounded in anything outside of itself."

Johann Gottlieb Fichte - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Johann Gottlieb Fichte - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: "In his famous work Foundations of Natural Right (1796), Fichte stated that self-consciousness was a social phenomonon. Namely, he writes that self-consciousness depends upon resistance from objects in the external world. However, the mere perception of these external objects depends on self-consciousness. The solution to this paradox, Fichte thinks, is that a being gains consciousness when 'summoned' to be conscious by another rational being outside of oneself."

Sartor Resartus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sartor Resartus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: "Sartor Resartus, published in 1833, was intended to be a new kind of book: simultaneously factual and fictional, serious and satirical, speculative and historical. It ironically commented on its own formal structure (as Tristram Shandy had, long before), while forcing the reader to confront the problem of where 'truth' is to be found. The imaginary 'Philosophy of Clothes' holds that meaning is to be derived from phenomena, continually shifting over history, as cultures reconstruct themselves in changing fashions, power-structures, and faith-systems. The book contains a very Fichtean conception of religious conversion: based not on the acceptance of God but on the absolute freedom of the will to reject evil, and to construct meaning. This has led some writers to see Sartor Resartus as an early Existentialist text.

Sartor Resartus was initially considered by some bizarre and incomprehensible, but had a limited success in America, where it was admired by Ralph Waldo Emerson, influencing the development of New England Transcendentalism."

Friday, May 19, 2006

Slate Magazine

Slate Magazine: "If you'd like to read a complex well researched study of how the novel's form altered and developed in response to new attitudes toward the self, let me recommend a brilliant book by an old teacher of mine at UCLA, Vincent Pecora's Self and Form in Modern Narrative, dealing with various Victorian literary worthies but especially Joseph Conrad."

Why does it take Wes Anderson so long to make a movie? By Armond White

Why does it take Wes Anderson so long to make a movie? By Armond White: "Truffaut, Godard, Malle, and Chabrol did in the French New Wave; as Fassbinder, Herzog, and Wenders did in the German New Wave; or as Altman, Bogdanovich, Ashby, Walter Hill, and Woody Allen did during that '70s period known as the American Renaissance."

Monday, May 08, 2006

Salon.com Books | Hipster rebel punk outsiders -- 99 cents a dozen

Salon.com Books | Hipster rebel punk outsiders -- 99 cents a dozen: "As another European expat scholar, George Steiner, has put it, we live in a 'post-culture' (he means post-Auschwitz and post-Hiroshima) in which all the moral certainties of Western civilization have been stripped away and we wander about with no clear purpose, like ants whose hill has been blown up by a kid with a firecracker."

Salon.com Books | Hipster rebel punk outsiders -- 99 cents a dozen

Salon.com Books | Hipster rebel punk outsiders -- 99 cents a dozen: "1944 essay 'The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception,' by the German-Jewish refugee scholars Max Horkheimer and T.W. Adorno (from their book 'Dialectic of Enlightenment'). All human needs, they write, are 'presented to individuals as capable of fulfillment by the culture industry,' but 'individuals experience themselves through their needs only as eternal consumers, as the culture industry's object.' The point here is 'the necessity, inherent in the system, of never releasing its grip on the consumer, of not for a moment allowing him or her to suspect that resistance is possible.'"

Dictionary.com/verklempt

Dictionary.com/verklempt: "Main Entry: verklempt
Part of Speech: adjective
Definition: overcome with emotion; clenched; also written ferklempt
Etymology: Yiddish"

Saturday, May 06, 2006

New Scientist Features - Love special: Six ways to woo your lover

New Scientist Features - Love special: Six ways to woo your lover: "LET YOUR BODY DO THE TALKING

We all hunt for the perfect chat-up line, but in reality, our body gives away a great deal before we open our mouth. It is estimated that when you meet a stranger, their impression of you is based 55 per cent on your appearance and body language, 38 per cent on your style of speaking and a mere 7 per cent on what you actually say.

So what can we learn from the experts? There are a number of actions that signal 'I like you' to another person. Adopting an open posture (no folded arms), and mirroring another's posture help create a feeling of affinity. Most people are not conscious of being mirrored, but evaluate those who do it more favourably. And it is worth adopting stances that enhance your masculinity or femininity, such as placing hands in pockets with elbows out to enlarge the chest.

You could also indulge in a 'gestural dance', synchronising your gestures and body movements with those of the object of your desire, such as taking a sip of your drinks at the same time.

EXPERIENCE FEAR TOGETHER

A dramatic setting can kick-start your love life. Meeting a stranger when physiologically aroused increases the chance of having romantic feelings towards them ...

It's all because of a strong connection between anxiety, arousal and attraction. In the 'shaky bridge study' carried out by psychologists Arthur Aron and Don Dutton in the 1970s, men who met a woman on a high, rickety bridge found the encounter sexier and more romantic than those who met her on a low, stable one. A visit to the funfair works wonders too. Photos of members of the opposite sex were more attractive to people who had just got off a roller coaster, compared with those who were waiting to get on. And couples were more loved-up after watching a suspense-filled thriller than a calmer film. Why? No one is sure, but the adrenaline rush from the danger might be misattributed to the thrill of attraction. But beware: while someone attractive becomes more so in a tense setting, the unattractive appear even less appealing.
SHARE A JOKE

An experience that makes you laugh creates feelings of closeness between strangers. A classic example comes from experiments carried out by US psychologists Arthur Aron and Barbara Fraley, in which strangers cooperated on playful activities such as learning dance steps, but with one partner wearing a blindfold and the other holding a drinking straw in their mouth to distort speech. Sounds stupid, but love and laughter really did go together. You can read about it in 'The effect of a shared humorous experience on closeness in initial encounters' in the journal Personal Relationships (vol 11, p 61). We suggest that the blindfold/drinking straw approach is best confined to the laboratory.

GET THE SOUNDTRACK RIGHT

Psychologists at North Adams State College in Massachusetts have proved what Shakespeare suggested - that music is the food of love. Well, rock music, at least. Women evaluating photos of men rated them more attractive while listening to soft-rock music, compared with avant-garde jazz or no music at all.
USE LOVE POTIONS?

Can you short-cut all the hard work of relationship-building by artificial means? People have been trying to crack this one for thousands of years. A nasal spray containing the hormone oxytocin can make people trust you - an important part of any relationship - though there's no evidence yet to suggest it can make someone fall in love. And while we wouldn't suggest you try this at home, studies on prairie voles show that injecting the hormone vasopressin into the brain makes males bond strongly to females. Illegal drugs such as cocaine or amphetamines can simulate the euphoria of falling in love by raising levels of the neurotransmitter dopamine, but dopamine levels can also be increased legally by exercising. Another neurotransmitter, phenylethylamine (PEA), is tagged the 'love molecule' because it induces feelings of excitement and apprehension. PEA is found in chocolate and it, too, is linked to the feel-good effects of exercise. Overall, a swift jog could be more conducive to love than anything you might find in a bottle.
GAZE INTO THEIR EYES

Any flirt knows that making eye contact is an emotionally loaded act. Now psychologists have shown just how powerful it can be. When pairs of strangers were asked to gaze into each other's eyes, it was perhaps not surprising that their feelings of closeness and attraction rocketed compared with, say, gazing at each other's hands. More surprising was that a couple in one such experiment ended up getting married. Neuroscientists have shed some light on what's going on: meeting another person's gaze lights up brain regions associated with rewards. The bottom line is that eye contact can work wonders, but make sure you get your technique right: if your gaze isn't reciprocated, you risk coming across as a stalker."

Monday, May 01, 2006

Amazon.com: The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating: Books: David M. Buss

Amazon.com: The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating: Books: David M. Buss: "But most societies aren't patriarchal, as Buss believes, rather are instead kyriarchical: a few men control everybody else ('kyri' is the Greek word for overlord). Such societies are polygynous, and the median woman is better off than the median man. Such societies are mostly run by the Grand Pooh-bah's senior wives. And these hierarchical societies were created by women selecting to mate with certain men and not others."

Wednesday, April 26, 2006

How to insult in verse. By Robert Pinsky

How to insult in verse. By Robert Pinsky: "I'd be a dog, a monkey, or a bar,
Or anything but that vain animal,
Who is so proud of being rational.
The senses are too gross, and he'll contrive
A sixth, to contradict the other five:
And before certain instinct will prefer
Reason, which fifty times for one does err."

Tuesday, April 25, 2006

New Scientist SPACE - News - Need a food or drug hit? Just relax

New Scientist SPACE - News - Need a food or drug hit? Just relax: "STRESS can trigger binge eating and compulsive drug-taking. But how?

Kent Berridge of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and colleagues suggest that stress hormones might actually change how much we value a reward, increasing our desire for something pleasurable without actually increasing our enjoyment.

Berridge's team injected the stress hormone corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) into the nucleus accumbens of rats' brains, a part of the dopamine 'reward circuitry' responsible for wanting or desire. These rats had been trained to press a lever to get a dose of sugar and to associate hearing a certain tone with getting that sugar. The stressed rats worked harder at pressing the lever when they heard the tone than rats with low stress hormones (BMC Biology, DOI: 10.1186/1741-7007-4-8).

The effect looked exactly the same as when amphetamines were injected, something well known to increase desire. 'Stress magnifies the wanting,' says Berridge - but only when there's a cue, the tone, to advertise the reward as well. It's a bit like how seeing an advert for ice cream makes you desire it, he says. You might resist when you're not stressed, but the advert and the stress together make it irresistible.

The findings could explain why some stressful pursuits can be rewarding, and also how drug paraphernalia and stress can make relapse almost inevitable."

Monday, April 24, 2006

New Scientist SPACE - Breaking News - Watching the brain 'switch off' self-awareness

New Scientist SPACE - Breaking News - Watching the brain 'switch off' self-awareness: "Goldberg found that when the sensory stimulus was shown slowly, and when a personal emotional response was required, the volunteers showed activity in the superfrontal gyrus – the brain region associated with self-awareness-related function.

But when the card flipping and musical sequences were rapid, there was no activity in the superfrontal gyrus, despite activity in the sensory cortex and related structures.

“The regions of the brain involved in introspection and sensory perception are completely segregated, although well connected,” says Goldberg, “and when the brain needs to divert all its resources to carry out a difficult task, the self-related cortex is inhibited.”

The brain’s ability to “switch off” the self may have evolved as a protective mechanism, he suggests. “If there is a sudden danger, such as the appearance of a snake, it is not helpful to stand around wondering how one feels about the situation,” Goldberg points out.

It is possible that research into how the brain switches self-awareness on and off will help neurologists gain a deeper understanding of autism, schizophrenia and other mental disorders where this functionality may be impaired."

New Scientist News - All the pleasures of alcohol, with no downsides

New Scientist News - All the pleasures of alcohol, with no downsides: "In fact such 'partial agonists' of GABA-A receptors already exist in the form of bretazenil and pagoclone, which were developed as anti-anxiety drugs but never commercialised. These molecules also have the advantage of being instantly reversible by the drug flumazenil, which is used as an antidote to overdoses of tranquillisers such as Valium. Alcohol also inhibits NMDA receptors, which are part of a general excitatory signalling circuit, so a second ingredient of the alcohol substitute would be an NMDA antagonist such as dizoclipine, originally developed as a drug for stroke."

New Scientist SPACE - News - Lazy mole rats that get fat to have sex

New Scientist SPACE - News - Lazy mole rats that get fat to have sex: "Damaraland mole rats and naked mole rats are thought to be the only mammal species that live and breed cooperatively, with some colony members devoting their lives to helping others reproduce."

Sunday, April 23, 2006

The Dilbert Blog: Education and Religion

The Dilbert Blog: Education and Religion: "“The gods can either take away evil from the world and will not, or, being willing to do so cannot; or they neither can nor will, or lastly, they are able and willing.

If they have the will to remove evil and cannot, then they are not omnipotent.

If they can but will not, then they are not benevolent.

If they are neither able nor willing, they are neither omnipotent nor benevolent.

If they are both able and willing to annihilate evil, why does it exist?”

-- Greek philosopher Epicurus (341-270 B.C.E.), Aphorisms"

The Dilbert Blog: Education and Religion

The Dilbert Blog: Education and Religion: "“The gods can either take away evil from the world and will not, or, being willing to do so cannot; or they neither can nor will, or lastly, they are able and willing.

If they have the will to remove evil and cannot, then they are not omnipotent.

If they can but will not, then they are not benevolent.

If they are neither able nor willing, they are neither omnipotent nor benevolent.

If they are both able and willing to annihilate evil, why does it exist?”

-- Greek philosopher Epicurus (341-270 B.C.E.), Aphorisms"

Thursday, April 13, 2006

Two new books about Jesus. By Richard Wightman Fox

Two new books about Jesus. By Richard Wightman Fox: "Emerson insisted, just wanted to impose a new conformity. 'It is easy in the world to live after the world's opinion; it is easy in solitude to live after our own; but the great man is he who in the midst of the crowd keeps with perfect sweetness the independence of solitude.'"

Friday, March 03, 2006

On Not Wanting to Know What Hurts You - New York Times

On Not Wanting to Know What Hurts You - New York Times: "'It's not whether I actually bother to control it,' Dr. Sandman said. 'It's whether I feel I can.' The factors that influence worry are often linked. Familiarity, for instance, can moderate the sense of dread, said Paul Slovic, a psychologist with Decision Research, a nonprofit research institution in Eugene, Ore. Car accidents, he noted, are as horrific as cancer, yet 'we don't have the same sense of dread around cars that we do around carcinogens' because we drive all the time.

Faced with unfamiliar diseases, people rely on other measures to calculate risk. For example, they may unconsciously use prevalence as a gauge, said Howard Leventhal, a professor of health psychology at Rutgers.

'Prevalent events are seen as less serious than rare events,' Dr. Leventhal said in an e-mail message. The logic is simple, he said: if lots of people have a disease but are not hospitalized or dying, it must be relatively benign; if it is rare, it might have serious, unknown consequences."

Tuesday, February 28, 2006

Is Freedom Just Another Word for Many Things to Buy? - New York Times

Is Freedom Just Another Word for Many Things to Buy? - New York Times: "Another study that compared people in different occupations showed that those employed in middle-class jobs got upset when a friend or neighbor bought the same car as theirs because they felt that the uniqueness of their choice had been undercut. But those in working-class jobs liked it when others chose the same car because it affirmed that they had made a good choice."

Saturday, February 11, 2006

Sunday, October 02, 2005

do the right thing

In the 1970s and 1980s, Kohlberg argued that moral reasoning is based on explicit rules and concepts, like conscious logical problem-solving; over the course of an individual’s development, the rules and concepts that he or she uses to solve moral problems unfold in a well-defined, universal sequence of stages. These stages are biologically determined but socially supported. In early stages, moral reasoning is strongly influenced by external authority; in later stages, moral reasoning appeals first to internalized convention, and then to general principles of neutrality, egalitarianism, and universal rights. It may be that what makes one culture, one sex, or one individual different from another is just how high and how fast it manages to climb the moral ladder.

...

The psychologist Carol Gilligan, for example, argued that women justify their moral choices differently from men, but with equal sophistication. Men, she claimed, tend to reason about morality in terms of justice, and women in terms of care: “While an ethic of justice proceeds from the premise of equality—that everyone should be treated the same—an ethic of care rests on the premise of non-violence—that no one should be hurt.” Similar arguments were made for non-Western cultures—that they emphasize social roles and obligations rather than individual rights and justice.

...

The current theorists take as their model for moral reasoning not conscious problem-solving, as Kohlberg did, but the human language faculty. That is, rather than “moral reasoning,” human beings are understood to be endowed with a “moral instinct” that enables them to categorize and judge actions as right or wrong the way native speakers intuitively recognize sentences as grammatical or ungrammatical.

....

The psychologist Elliott Turiel has proposed that the moral rules a person espouses have a special psychological status that distinguishes them from other rules—like local conventions—that guide behavior. One of the clearest indicators of this so-called moral–conventional distinction is the role of local authority.

We understand that the rules of etiquette—whether it is permissible to leave food on your plate, to belch at the table, or to speak without first raising your hand—are subject to context, convention, and authority. If a friend told you before your first dinner at her parents’ house that in her family, belching at the table after dinner is a gesture of appreciation and gratitude, you would not think your friend’s father was immoral or wrong or even rude when he leaned back after dinner and belched—whether or not you could bring yourself to join in.

Moral judgments, in contrast, are conceived (by hypothesis) as not subject to the control of local authority. If your friend told you that in her family a man beating his wife after dinner is a gesture of appreciation and gratitude, your assessment of that act would presumably not be swayed. Even three-year-old children already distinguish between moral and conventional transgressions. They allow that if the teacher said so, it might be okay to talk during nap, or to stand up during snack time, or to wear pajamas to school. But they also assert that a teacher couldn’t make it okay to pull another child’s hair or to steal her backpack. Similarly, children growing up in deeply religious Mennonite communities distinguish between rules that apply because they are written in the Bible (e.g., that Sunday is the day of Sabbath, or that a man must uncover his head to pray) and rules that would still apply even if they weren’t actually written in the Bible (including rules against personal and material harm).

There is one exception, though. James Blair, of the National Institutes of Health, has found that children classified as psychopaths (partly because they exhibit persistent aggressive behavior toward others) do not make the normal moral–conventional distinction. These children know which behaviors are not allowed at school, and they can even rate the relative seriousness of different offences; but they fail when asked which offences would still be wrong to commit even if the teacher suspended the rules. For children with psychopathic tendencies (and for psychopathic adults, too, though not for those Blair calls “normal murderers”), rules are all a matter of local authority. In its absence, anything is permissible.

Turiel’s thesis, then, is that healthy individuals in all cultures respect the distinction between conventional violations, which depend on local authorities, and moral violations, which do not.

...

Jacobson-Widding argues that the Manyika do not separate moral behavior from good manners. Lying, farting, and stealing are all equally violations of tsika. And if manners and morals cannot be differentiated, the whole study of moral universals is in trouble, because how—as Jacobson-Widding herself asks—can we study the similarities and differences in moral reasoning across cultures “when the concept of morality does not exist?” From the perspective of cognitive science, this dispute over the origins of the moral–conventional distinction is an empirical question, and one that might be resolvable with the new techniques of infant developmental psychology.

One possibility is that children first distinguish “wrong” actions in their third year of life, as they begin to recognize the thoughts, feelings, and desires of other people. If this is true, the special status of moral reasoning would be tied to another special domain in human cognition: theory of mind, or our ability to make rich and specific inferences about the contents of other people’s thoughts. Although this link is plausible, there is some evidence that distinguishing moral right from wrong is a more primitive part of cognition than theory of mind, and can exist independently. Unlike psychopathic children, who have impaired moral reasoning in the presence of intact theory of mind, autistic children who struggle to infer other people’s thoughts are nevertheless able to make the normal moral–conventional distinction.

Another hypothesis is that children acquire the notion of “wrong” actions in their second year, once they are old enough to hurt others and experience firsthand the distress of the victim. Blair, for example, has proposed that human beings and social species like canines have developed a hard-wired “violence-inhibition mechanism” to restrain aggression against members of the same species. This mechanism is activated by a victim’s signals of distress and submission (like a dog rolling over onto its back) and produces a withdrawal response. When this mechanism is activated in an attacker, withdrawal means that the violence stops. The class of “wrong” actions, those that cause the victim’s distress, might be learned first for one’s own actions and then extended derivatively to others’ actions.

Monday, August 22, 2005

multiplication of wants

Gandhi's belief that "civilization consists not in the multiplication of wants but in the deliberate and voluntary reduction of wants."

Tuesday, August 02, 2005

food immunization

And the study raises similar ethical questions to the idea of vaccinating children against drugs. Supposing a vaccination against cocaine or nicotine becomes available, should parents have their children immunised? Should some people be allowed to impose their ideas on food onto others, even if it is for their own good?

http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7770&feedId=online-news_rss20

And the study raises similar ethical questions to the idea of vaccinating children against drugs. Supposing a vaccination against cocaine or nicotine becomes available, should parents have their children immunised? Should some people be allowed to impose their ideas on food onto others, even if it is for their own good?

http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7770&feedId=online-news_rss20

Saturday, July 09, 2005

smell of success

from

http://www.economist.com/science/displayStory.cfm?story_id=4149493

The upshot of the trial was that women did, indeed, find the odour of dominants sexier than that of wimps—but only in special circumstances. These circumstances were first that the woman was already in a relationship and second that she was in the most fertile phase of her cycle. In other words, dominant males' scent was only more attractive at the point where a woman could both conceive and cuckold her mate.

Tuesday, May 31, 2005

from NYtimes

Watching New Love as It Sears the Brain

New love can look for all the world like mental illness, a blend of mania, dementia and obsession that cuts people off from friends and family and prompts out-of-character behavior - compulsive phone calling, serenades, yelling from rooftops - that could almost be mistaken for psychosis.

Now for the first time, neuroscientists have produced brain scan images of this fevered activity, before it settles into the wine and roses phase of romance or the joint holiday card routines of long-term commitment.

In an analysis of the images appearing today in The Journal of Neurophysiology, researchers in New York and New Jersey argue that romantic love is a biological urge distinct from sexual arousal.

It is closer in its neural profile to drives like hunger, thirst or drug craving, the researchers assert, than to emotional states like excitement or affection. As a relationship deepens, the brain scans suggest, the neural activity associated with romantic love alters slightly, and in some cases primes areas deep in the primitive brain that are involved in long-term attachment.

The research helps explain why love produces such disparate emotions, from euphoria to anger to anxiety, and why it seems to become even more intense when it is withdrawn. In a separate, continuing experiment, the researchers are analyzing brain images from people who have been rejected by their lovers.

"When you're in the throes of this romantic love it's overwhelming, you're out of control, you're irrational, you're going to the gym at 6 a.m. every day - why? Because she's there," said Dr. Helen Fisher, an anthropologist at Rutgers University and the co-author of the analysis. "And when rejected, some people contemplate stalking, homicide, suicide. This drive for romantic love can be stronger than the will to live."

Brain imaging technology cannot read people's minds, experts caution, and a phenomenon as many sided and socially influenced as love transcends simple computer graphics, like those produced by the technique used in the study, called functional M.R.I.

Still, said Dr. Hans Breiter, director of the Motivation and Emotion Neuroscience Collaboration at Massachusetts General Hospital, "I distrust about 95 percent of the M.R.I. literature and I would give this study an 'A'; it really moves the ball in terms of understanding infatuation love."

He added: "The findings fit nicely with a large, growing body of literature describing a generalized reward and aversion system in the brain, and put this intellectual construct of love directly onto the same axis as homeostatic rewards such as food, warmth, craving for drugs."

In the study, Dr. Fisher, Dr. Lucy Brown of Albert Einstein College of Medicine in the Bronx and Dr. Arthur Aron, a psychologist at the State University of New York at Stony Brook, led a team that analyzed about 2,500 brain images from 17 college students who were in the first weeks or months of new love. The students looked at a picture of their beloved while an M.R.I. machine scanned their brains. The researchers then compared the images with others taken while the students looked at picture of an acquaintance.

Functional M.R.I. technology detects increases or decreases of blood flow in the brain, which reflect changes in neural activity.

In the study, a computer-generated map of particularly active areas showed hot spots deep in the brain, below conscious awareness, in areas called the caudate nucleus and the ventral tegmental area, which communicate with each other as part of a circuit.

These areas are dense with cells that produce or receive a brain chemical called dopamine, which circulates actively when people desire or anticipate a reward. In studies of gamblers, cocaine users and even people playing computer games for small amounts of money, these dopamine sites become extremely active as people score or win, neuroscientists say.

Yet falling in love is among the most irrational of human behaviors, not merely a matter of satisfying a simple pleasure, or winning a reward. And the researchers found that one particular spot in the M.R.I. images, in the caudate nucleus, was especially active in people who scored highly on a questionnaire measuring passionate love.

This passion-related region was on the opposite side of the brain from another area that registers physical attractiveness, the researchers found, and appeared to be involved in longing, desire and the unexplainable tug that people feel toward one person, among many attractive alternative partners.

This distinction, between finding someone attractive and desiring him or her, between liking and wanting, "is all happening in an area of the mammalian brain that takes care of most basic functions, like eating, drinking, eye movements, all at an unconscious level, and I don't think anyone expected this part of the brain to be so specialized," Dr. Brown said.

The intoxication of new love mellows with time, of course, and the brain scan findings reflect some evidence of this change, Dr. Fisher said.

In an earlier functional M.R.I. study of romance, published in 2000, researchers at University College London monitored brain activity in young men and women who had been in relationships for about two years. The brain images, also taken while participants looked at photos of their beloved, showed activation in many of the same areas found in the new study - but significantly less so, in the region correlated with passionate love, she said.

In the new study, the researchers also saw individual differences in their group of smitten lovers, based on how long the participants had been in the relationships. Compared with the students who were in the first weeks of a new love, those who had been paired off for a year or more showed significantly more activity in an area of the brain linked to long-term commitment.

Last summer, scientists at Emory University in Atlanta reported that injecting a ratlike animal called a vole with a single gene turned promiscuous males into stay-at-home dads - by activating precisely the same area of the brain where researchers in the new study found increased activity over time.

"This is very suggestive of attachment processes taking place," Dr. Brown said. "You can almost imagine a time where instead of going to Match.com you could have a test to find out whether you're an attachment type or not."

One reason new love is so heart-stopping is the possibility, the ever-present fear, that the feeling may not be entirely requited, that the dream could suddenly end.

In a follow-up experiment, Dr. Fisher, Dr. Aron and Dr. Brown have carried out brain scans on 17 other young men and women who recently were dumped by their lovers. As in the new love study, the researchers compared two sets of images, one taken when the participants were looking at a photo of a friend, the other when looking at a picture of their ex.

Although they are still sorting through the images, the investigators have noticed one preliminary finding: increased activation in an area of the brain related to the region associated with passionate love. "It seems to suggest what the psychological literature, poetry and people have long noticed: that being dumped actually does heighten romantic love, a phenomenon I call frustration-attraction," Dr. Fisher said in an e-mail message.

One volunteer in the study was Suzanna Katz, 22, of New York, who suffered through a breakup with her boyfriend three years ago. Ms. Katz said she became hyperactive to distract herself after the split, but said she also had moments of almost physical withdrawal, as if weaning herself from a drug.

"It had little to do with him, but more with the fact that there was something there, inside myself, a hope, a knowledge that there's someone out there for you, and that you're capable of feeling this way, and suddenly I felt like that was being lost," she said in an interview.

And no wonder. In a series of studies, researchers have found that, among other processes, new love involves psychologically internalizing a lover, absorbing elements of the other person's opinions, hobbies, expressions, character, as well as sharing one's own. "The expansion of the self happens very rapidly, it's one of the most exhilarating experiences there is, and short of threatening our survival it is one thing that most motivates us," said Dr. Aron, of SUNY, a co-author of the study.

To lose all that, all at once, while still in love, plays havoc with the emotional, cognitive and deeper reward-driven areas of the brain. But the heightened activity in these areas inevitably settles down. And the circuits in the brain related to passion remain intact, the researchers say - intact and capable in time of flaring to life with someone new.

Tuesday, May 10, 2005

Of Two Minds - New York Times

Of Two Minds - New York Times: "One recent discovery to confront is that the human brain can readily change its structure -- a phenomenon scientists call neuroplasticity. A few years ago, brain scans of London cabbies showed that the detailed mental maps they had built up in the course of navigating their city's complicated streets were apparent in their brains. Not only was the posterior hippocampus -- one area of the brain where spatial representations are stored -- larger in the drivers; the increase in size was proportional to the number of years they had been on the job.

It may not come as a great surprise that interaction with the environment can alter our mental architecture. But there is also accumulating evidence that the brain can change autonomously, in response to its own internal signals. Last year, Tibetan Buddhist monks, with the encouragement of the Dalai Lama, submitted to functional magnetic resonance imaging as they practiced ''compassion meditation,'' which is aimed at achieving a mental state of pure loving kindness toward all beings. The brain scans showed only a slight effect in novice meditators. But for monks who had spent more than 10,000 hours in meditation, the differences in brain function were striking. Activity in the left prefrontal cortex, the locus of joy, overwhelmed activity in the right prefrontal cortex, the locus of anxiety."

Of Two Minds - New York Times

Of Two Minds - New York Times: "Damage to the right frontal lobe, for example, sometimes led to a heightened interest in high cuisine, a condition dubbed gourmand syndrome. (One European political journalist, upon recovering from a stroke affecting this part of the brain, profited from the misfortune by becoming a food columnist.)"

Sunday, May 08, 2005

Freud and His Discontents - The New York Times - New York Times

Freud and His Discontents - The New York Times - New York Times: "Freud's essay rests on three arguments that are impossible to prove: the development of civilization recapitulates the development of the individual; civilization's central purpose of repressing the aggressive instinct exacts unbearable suffering; the individual is torn between the desire to live (Eros) and the wish to die (Thanatos)."

Friday, April 29, 2005

Scientific American: His Brain, Her Brain

Scientific American: His Brain, Her Brain: "They took their video camera to a maternity ward to examine the preferences of babies that were only one day old. The infants saw either the friendly face of a live female student or a mobile that matched the color, size and shape of the student's face and included a scrambled mix of her facial features. To avoid any bias, the experimenters were unaware of each baby's sex during testing. When they watched the tapes, they found that the girls spent more time looking at the student, whereas the boys spent more time looking at the mechanical object. This difference in social interest was evident on day one of life--implying again that we come out of the womb with some cognitive sex differences built in."

Scientific American: His Brain, Her Brain

Scientific American: His Brain, Her Brain: "The researchers presented a group of vervet monkeys with a selection of toys, including rag dolls, trucks and some gender-neutral items such as picture books. They found that male monkeys spent more time playing with the 'masculine' toys than their female counterparts did, and female monkeys spent more time interacting with the playthings typically preferred by girls. Both sexes spent equal time monkeying with the picture books and other gender-neutral toys."

Scientific American: His Brain, Her Brain

Scientific American: His Brain, Her Brain: "Such anatomical diversity may be caused in large part by the activity of the sex hormones that bathe the fetal brain. These steroids help to direct the organization and wiring of the brain during development and influence the structure and neuronal density of various regions. Interestingly, the brain areas that Goldstein found to differ between men and women are ones that in animals contain the highest number of sex hormone receptors during development. This correlation between brain region size in adults and sex steroid action in utero suggests that at least some sex differences in cognitive function do not result from cultural influences or the hormonal changes associated with puberty--they are there from birth."

Wednesday, April 27, 2005

Language Log: Trees spring eternal

Language Log: Trees spring eternal: "'things are trees' idea over many millenia of hominid inquiry into nature. A believer in evolutionary psychology might even suppose that our brains have learned to think that things are trees, genetically as well as memetically."

Untitled Document

Untitled Document: "The world - David Hume writes - is perhaps the rudimentary sketch of a childish god, who left it half done, ashamed by his deficient work; it is created by a subordinate god, at whom the superior gods laugh; it is the confused production of a decrepit and retiring divinity, who has already died' ('Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion', V. 1779"

Shirky: The Semantic Web, Syllogism, and Worldview

Shirky: The Semantic Web, Syllogism, and Worldview: "The people working on the Semantic Web greatly overestimate the value of deductive reasoning (a persistent theme in Artificial Intelligence projects generally.) The great popularizer of this error was Arthur Conan Doyle, whose Sherlock Holmes stories have done more damage to people's understanding of human intelligence than anyone other than Rene Descartes. Doyle has convinced generations of readers that what seriously smart people do when they think is to arrive at inevitable conclusions by linking antecedent facts. As Holmes famously put it 'when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.'

This sentiment is attractive precisely because it describes a world simpler than our own. In the real world, we are usually operating with partial, inconclusive or context-sensitive information. When we have to make a decision based on this information, we guess, extrapolate, intuit, we do what we did last time, we do what we think our friends would do or what Jesus or Joan Jett would have done, we do all of those things and more, but we almost never use actual deductive logic."

Tuesday, April 12, 2005

Linguistics 001 -- Communication: a Biological Perspective

Linguistics 001 -- Communication: a Biological Perspective: "In a word, the answer is ritual. Indeed, ritual is still a central component of symbolic 'education' in modern human societies, though we are seldom aware of its modern role because of the subtle way it is woven into the fabric of society. The problem for symbol discovery is to shift attention from the concrete to the abstract; from separate indexical links between signs and objects to an organized set of relations between signs. In order to bring the logic of token-token relationships to the fore, a high degree of redundancy is important. This was demonstrated in the experiments with the chimpanzees Sherman and Austin. It was found that getting them to repeat by rote a large number of errorless trials in combining lexigrams enabled them to make the transition from explicit and concrete sign-object associations to implicit sign-sign associations. Repetition of the same set of actions with the same set of objects over and over again in a ritual performance is often used for a similar purpose in modern human societies. Repetition can render the individual details for some performance automatic and minimally conscious, while at the same time the emotional intensity induced by group participation can help focus attention on other aspects of the objects and actions involved. In a ritual frenzy, one can be induced to see everyday activities and objects in a very different light."

Saturday, March 19, 2005

Feminist Ethics

Feminist Ethics: "Kohlberg claimed that moral development is a six-stage process. Stage One is the punishment and obedience orientation. To avoid the 'stick' of punishment and/or to receive the 'carrot' of a reward, children do as they are told. Stage Two is 'the instrumental relativist orientation.' Based on a limited principle of reciprocity — You scratch my back and I'll scratch yours — children meet others' needs only if others meet their needs. Stage Three is the 'good boy-nice girl' orientation. Adolescents conform to prevailing norms to secure others' approval and love. Stage Four is the law and order orientation. Adolescents begin to do their duty, show respect for authority, and maintain the given social order to secure others' admiration and respect for them as honorable, law abiding citizens. Stage Five is the social-contract legalistic orientation. Adults adopt an essentially utilitarian moral point of view according to which individuals are permitted to do as they please, provided they refrain from harming other people in the process. Stage Six is the universal ethical principle orientation. Adults adopt an essentially Kantian moral perspective that seeks to transcend and judge all conventional moralities. Adults are no longer ruled by self-interest, the opinion of others, or the fear of legal punishment, but by self-legislated and self-imposed universal principles such as those of justice, reciprocity, and respect for the dignity of human persons (Kohlberg in Mischel, ed., Cognitive Development and Epistemology, 1971)."

Saturday, March 05, 2005

Economist.com | Synaesthesia

Economist.com | Synaesthesia: "In ES's case, that happens too. Individual tones have their own colours: C is red, F-sharp is violet. But her perception of intervals as flavours, reported in this week's Nature by Gian Beeli and his colleagues at the University of Zurich, is a phenomenon recorded only once before."

Friday, March 04, 2005

Mangiare Bene - Rules for cooking Pasta

Mangiare Bene - Rules for cooking Pasta: "The quantity of salt to water should be 1/2 tablespoon per litre"

Wednesday, March 02, 2005

Thursday, February 10, 2005

The New York Times > Technology > For Local Searchers, Amazon Adds Photos to Yellow Pages

The New York Times > Technology > For Local Searchers, Amazon Adds Photos to Yellow Pages:


"To achieve this, A9 sent out a sport utility vehicle equipped with a digital video camera. In Manhattan, for example, a driver spent more than a week cruising down streets, capturing images and cataloging the location of each business using a global positioning system receiver."

current issue

current issue:

'Pink tea,' originally meaning a highly fashionable (and exclusive) tea party, is an American invention dating back to the late 19th century. The use of 'pink' to mean 'fashionable' or 'exclusive' harks back to the very old sense of 'pink' meaning 'the peak or finest example' of something, a use dating back to the 16th century, probably ultimately derived from the pinkish complexion of a Caucasian person in good health ('in the pink'). By the 17th century, 'pink' was being used both as a noun meaning 'one of the elite' and an adjective meaning 'exquisite' or 'exclusive.'

Wednesday, February 09, 2005

Entrez PubMed

Entrez PubMed: "Temporal lobe abnormalities in semantic processing by criminal psychopaths as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging."

Note, find thisarticle.

Thursday, January 27, 2005

The democracy that hates you...

"The democracy that hates you is less dangerous than the dictator that loves you."

From The Case for Democracy Natan Sharansky (p95).

My Sharansky - Bush's favorite book doesn't always endorse his policies. By Chris Suellentrop:

Tuesday, January 25, 2005

Reason: Stigmatizing Fathers: Dads lose both ways in adoption cases

Reason: Stigmatizing Fathers: Dads lose both ways in adoption cases: "In the end, our society sends men quite a mixed message. If your partner gets pregnant and decides to keep the baby, you're liable for 18 years of child support, whether or not you want to be a father. If she doesn't want to be a mother, she can give your child to strangers and there isn't much you can do. Then we complain that men don't take parenthood seriously enough."

Chinks in the alliance

The New York Times > Washington > Backers of Gay Marriage Ban Use Social Security as Cudgel:

"WASHINGTON, Jan. 24 - A coalition of major conservative Christian groups is threatening to withhold support for President Bush's plans to remake Social Security unless Mr. Bush vigorously champions a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage."

Monday, January 24, 2005

The New York Times > Science > Gray Matter and Sexes: A Gray Area Scientifically

The New York Times > Science > Gray Matter and Sexes: A Gray Area Scientifically:

For Dr. Summers and others, the overwhelmingly male tails of the bell curve may be telling. Such results, taken together with assorted other neuro-curiosities like the comparatively greater number of boys with learning disorders, autism and attention deficit disorder, suggest to them that the male brain is a delicate object, inherently prone to extremes, both of incompetence and of genius.


Who is this guy! I love him. I've been pointing that out too - being born a male, that's no guarantee of success. We may see more males at the very top of success than females but we need to take into account all those males who fail utterly, those in jail, those with mental illnesses, those who die in war or crime. That is, there is selection bias in saying men have advantages over women. Only those who survived have it better than women.

One comparison is to polygamy (legally having more than one wife). Is it good for males or bad? The initial response is: sure, it's good for males because they can have a harem (salacious laughter). But look at it more closely. It's not the case that a polygamous society would instantaneously have more girls be born. No, there would still be a 1:1, male:female ratio (more accurately, it's 105:100 ratio in the US, at birth; and it declines every second after that). If some man has three wives that means there are two men out there unable to find a wife. On average it would be the same as a strictly monogamous society. But that's on average. It may still be better to be born a female in such a society. Why? Because it's safer. There's more insurance for a woman. She can always find a mate, even if she has to share him with other women. That's not the case with men. They have a higher chance of having multiple mates but also a higher chance of having no mates at all. In this society, males and females may average the same number of mates, but males have a larger Bell curve (compare high risk investment options).


(It should be pointed out that a society such as the US, where there are no legal penalties for having a mistress, is partially polygamous. A status-rich man can have as many women as he can provide status for.)

The New York Times > Science > Gray Matter and Sexes: A Gray Area Scientifically

The New York Times > Science > Gray Matter and Sexes: A Gray Area Scientifically: "Yet Dr. Summers, who said he intended his remarks to be provocative, and other scientists have observed that while average math skillfulness may be remarkably analogous between the sexes, men tend to display comparatively greater range in aptitude. Males are much likelier than females to be found on the tail ends of the bell curve, among the superhigh scorers and the very bottom performers.

Among college-bound seniors who took the math SAT's in 2001, for example, nearly twice as many boys as girls scored over 700, and the ratio skews ever more male the closer one gets to the top tally of 800. Boys are also likelier than girls to get nearly all the answers wrong."

That's what I've been saying for years. One can't just compare the tops, because the variability could be larger for men.

Sunday, January 23, 2005

Dubium fiat!

Dubium fiat! What creationists want to do is to use intelligent design (ID) to drive a wedge of uncertainty into the theory of evolution. Or rather, there's already a crack of uncertainty in all scientific theories; and ID proponents want to widen that crack to a full-blown fissure.

However, if the goal is to make the creationism alternative more credible, they are using the wrong tool to do so. Doubt, once engaged, will easily be turned against ID as well. This is a point that both pro- and anti-ID people don't get: doubt is good for science but bad for religion. So science teachers should welcome doubt into their classrooms. See what happens when doubt and scientific thinking are applied to ID itself.

If ID is taught in school science class, it could follow along these lines:

  1. biological complexity exists and:
    • on average, biological complexity has increased over time (possibly from zero)
    • there is biological complexity in all organisms, thought the change may have been different for different species/environments.
    • changes in biological complexity have applied throughout time, possibly at different rates
  2. to explain (A), either

1. there's no biological complexity-creating agent - ie, theory of evolution

2. there are biological complexity-creating agent(s) - ie, ID
This view branches:

      1. There is one agent for all biological complexity. We can call this agent the god of evolution. We don't know if this god can do other things besides create biological complexity. We don't know whether there are other gods for other 'intelligent' or complex effects (that is, a god of geology). If there is only one such agent and that agent can only create biological complexity, we can make this statement of equivalency God = Evolution (call this evotheism).
      2. There are numerous agents.
        1. One agent per function. That is, one agent for the creation of eyes, another for the creation of legs, another, of wings, etc.,.
        2. One agent per species. That is, one agent for muskrats, another agent presiding over clover. A species agent is born when the species arrives (a somewhat fuzzy concept), gives birth to new agents when the species branches, and dies when the species becomes extinct. There could also be competition among the species agents for resources and an evolution of species agents (a notion that Stephen Jay Gould called species selection).
        3. Some other partition of biological complexity-creating duties. By time: an agent for the Cambrian period, one for the Triassic period, etc. By location: an agent for land animals, one for marine plants, etc.


As you see, ID leads to a number of interesting branches. Most ID proponents don't want the branching to be taught in school. Why? Because their goal is to put doubt into evolution and to follow up that doubt by creationistic, ie, biblical, teaching (a subset of (2a)) in churches. But once they open ID for discussion, why should we stop with a statement of doubt? We should follow ID to its implications: a multitude of agent-oriented theologies.

ID is valuable for science. It brings doubt back into the picture. And doubt is a wonderful creator of new thoughts. Maybe there is an agent of uncertainty which spawns new thinking; we could call it the god of doubt. Or maybe there's one God that said, Dubium fiat (Let there be doubt) and it was good.


Literalness

Philip Glass on NPR: "We stop playing (being children) when we take the world too literally."

Saturday, January 22, 2005

fresh shrift

How cold is it? (from NPR)

... brain freeze without ice cream.
... brass monkeys leaving.
... boogers can freeze.
... smoke stands still.
... colder than yenti's balls.
... freeze the ticks off a moose.
... colder than a witch's tit.

Philosophy Now

Philosophy Now: "One of his main arguments in Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason is that people can understand the moral law without the aid of organised religion. It is simply redundant as a moral aid. He goes even further: There is an inherent tension between morality and religion because there is a danger that people may act morally not because it is the right thing to do but because their religion prescribes it. This would take away the value of a good act: Kant is convinced that we can do the right thing for the wrong reasons, which would be devoid of moral merit. Achieving desirable outcomes is not enough; moral merit lies in the right intentions that are freely willed. Freedom is the necessary ground for the existence of the moral law."

Economist.com | The economics of happiness

Economist.com | The economics of happiness: "Among many things, the behaviourists have found that it is relative, not absolute wealth, that matters most to people. Mr Layard cites as evidence a study in which Harvard University students claimed to prefer earning $50,000 a year when their peers are on only $25,000 to a world in which they earn $100,000 while their peers get more than double that amount."

This seems obvious too. You are comparing yourself to people as close to you as possible, in order to gage whether your choices and innateness is what has given you success. A Harvard student does recognize that their fair competitor is another Harvard student, not an orphan from genocide in Rwanda. Their school counterparts are versions of themselves, that is, parallel lives, and the Harvard student is in a competition with the choices they could have made.

Likewise, neighbors who compare the greenness of each other's lawns are in competition with what else they could have done (after all they can't blame the weather - it was the same for their neighbor). The comparison of lawns is fair. Which is why so many hire designated hitters, the gardening services.

Economist.com | The economics of happiness

Economist.com | The economics of happiness: "Lord Layard devotes a good portion of the book to a summary of what is known about how to be happy. Much of it will appear self-evident: cultivate friendships, be involved in a community, try for a good marriage. But his big idea is controversial. It is that a zero-sum game of competition for money and status has gripped rich societies, and that this rat race is a big source of unhappiness."

Why would this be controversial? It seems perfectly obvious, and probably supported by psychoneurology too. After fufilling basic needs, we move up in Maslow's pyramid to achievement. That's where we bump into all those other people trying to achieve too. In fact I believe that's people join bowling and billiard leagues - to give themselves an area for success (outside of work). We can't all be boss, but some of us have a great softball pitch.

City Journal Autumn 2004 | The Frivolity of Evil by Theodore Dalrymple

City Journal Autumn 2004 | The Frivolity of Evil by Theodore Dalrymple: "Everyone has a right to health; depression is unhealthy; therefore everyone has a right to be happy (the opposite of being depressed). This idea in turn implies that one's state of mind, or one's mood, is or should be independent of the way that one lives one's life, a belief that must deprive human existence of all meaning, radically disconnecting reward from conduct."

Thursday, January 20, 2005

Economist.com | Human evolution

Economist.com | Human evolution

This is a typical example of the sort of game that economists investigating game theory revel in, and both theory and practice suggests that a player can take one of three approaches in such a game: co-operate with his opponents to maximise group benefits (but at the risk of being suckered), free-ride (ie, try to sucker co-operators) or reciprocate (ie, co-operate with those who show signs of being co-operative, but not with free-riders).


And the three strategies did, indeed, have the same average pay-offs to the individuals who played them—though only 13% were co-operators, 20% free-riders and 63% reciprocators.

Tuesday, January 04, 2005

levirate. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000.

levirate. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000.: "The practice of marrying the widow of one's childless brother to maintain his line, as required by ancient Hebrew law."

Monday, January 03, 2005

opsonin. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000.

opsonin. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000.: "Latin opsnre, to buy provisions (from Greek opsnein, from opson, condiment, delicacy; see epi- in Appendix I) + –in."

Thursday, December 30, 2004

Abilify Pharmacology, Aripiprazole Pharmacology - HealthyPlace.com

Abilify Pharmacology, Aripiprazole Pharmacology - HealthyPlace.com: "Hyperglycemia, in some cases extreme and associated with ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar coma or death, has been reported in patients treated with atypical antipsychotics."

Wednesday, December 29, 2004

"He who works with his hands is a laborer. He who works with his hands and his head is a craftsman. He who works with his hands and his head and his heart is an artist.
St Fancis of Assisi"

"I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy, geography, natural history, naval architecture, navigation, commerce, and agriculture, in order to give their children a right to study painting, poetry, music, architecture, statuary, tapestry, and porcelain.
John Adams, 2nd U.S. President 1735-1826"

Saturday, December 25, 2004

disjoint thoughts

The dual life: spiritual and secular. Certainty and doubt. Mythos and logos.

Just because God can control everything doesn't mean he does (the Christian father/corporate balancing analogy: he delgates responsibilty for more minor stuff to humans).

king lear

"What, in ill thoughts again? Men must endure
Their going hence, even as their coming hither;
Ripeness is all" (edgar)

certainty vs. power

City Journal Spring 2004 | When Islam Breaks Down by Theodore Dalrymple: "their [Muslim] problem, and ours, is that they want the power that free inquiry confers, without either the free inquiry or the philosophy and institutions that guarantee that free inquiry."

How unique is this to Islam however? It seems to be a byproduct of all psyches.

Is Islam inherently unable to accomodate modernism?

City Journal Spring 2004 | When Islam Breaks Down by Theodore Dalrymple: "Unlike Christianity, which had to spend its first centuries developing institutions clandestinely and so from the outset clearly had to separate church from state, Islam was from its inception both church and state, one and indivisible, with no possible distinction between temporal and religious authority. Muhammad’s power was seamlessly spiritual and secular (although the latter grew ultimately out of the former), and he bequeathed this model to his followers. Since he was, by Islamic definition, the last prophet of God upon earth, his was a political model whose perfection could not be challenged or questioned without the total abandonment of the pretensions of the entire religion.

But his model left Islam with two intractable problems. One was political. Muhammad unfortunately bequeathed no institutional arrangements by which his successors in the role of omnicompetent ruler could be chosen (and, of course, a schism occurred immediately after the Prophet’s death, with some—today’s Sunnites—following his father-in-law, and some—today’s Shi’ites—his son-in-law). Compounding this difficulty, the legitimacy of temporal power could always be challenged by those who, citing Muhammad’s spiritual role, claimed greater religious purity or authority; the fanatic in Islam is always at a moral advantage vis-à-vis the moderate. Moreover, Islam—in which the mosque is a meetinghouse, not an institutional church—has no established, anointed ecclesiastical hierarchy to decide such claims authoritatively. With political power constantly liable to challenge from the pious, or the allegedly pious, tyranny becomes the only guarantor of stability, and assassination the only means of reform."

Foreign Affairs - The Global Baby Bust - Phillip Longman

Foreign Affairs - The Global Baby Bust - Phillip Longman: "The clear tendency of economic development is toward a more knowledge-based, networked economy in which decision-making and responsibility are increasingly necessary at lower levels. In such economies, however, children often remain economically dependent on their parents well into their own childbearing years because it takes that long to acquire the panoply of technical skills, credentials, social understanding, and personal maturity that more and more jobs now require."

Foreign Affairs - The Global Baby Bust - Phillip Longman

Foreign Affairs - The Global Baby Bust - Phillip Longman: "In 2000, 40-year-old women in the United States and in every European nation told surveys that they had produced fewer children than they intended. Indeed, if European women now in their 40s had been able to produce their ideal number of children, the continent would face no prospect of population loss."

Foreign Affairs - The Global Baby Bust - Phillip Longman

Foreign Affairs - The Global Baby Bust - Phillip Longman: "An aging society may have an urgent need to gain more output from each remaining worker, but without growing markets, individual firms have little incentive to learn how to do more with less -- and with a dwindling supply of human capital, they have fewer ideas to draw on."

Foreign Affairs - The Global Baby Bust - Phillip Longman

Foreign Affairs - The Global Baby Bust - Phillip Longman: "Theoretically, a highly efficient, global financial market could lend financial resources from rich, old countries that are short on labor to young, poor countries that are short on capital, and make the whole world better off. But for this to happen, old countries would have to contain their deficits and invest their savings in places that are themselves either on the threshold of hyper-aging (China, India, Mexico) or highly destabilized by religious fanaticism, disease, and war (most of the Middle East, sub-Saharan Africa, Indonesia), or both."

Foreign Affairs - The Global Baby Bust - Phillip Longman

Foreign Affairs - The Global Baby Bust - Phillip Longman: "Both common sense and a vast literature in finance and psychology support the claim that as one approaches retirement age, one usually becomes more reluctant to take career or financial risks. It is not surprising, therefore, that aging countries such as Italy, France, and Japan are marked by exceptionally low rates of job turnover and by exceptionally conservative use of capital."

Wednesday, December 22, 2004

What if there was a drug that increased one's appetite for form over content? I mean in terms of art. Less storytelling and more irony. O rmaybe the other way around.

Tuesday, December 21, 2004

Here's a topical poem (not only is today the longest day of the year, but it snowed here in Massachusetts yesterday)...

Stopping By Woods On A Snowy Evening
by Robert Frost

Whose woods these are I think I know.
His house is in the village, though;
He will not see me stopping here
To watch his woods fill up with snow.

My little horse must think it queer
To stop without a farmhouse near
Between the woods and frozen lake
The darkest evening of the year.

He gives his harness bells a shake
To ask if there is some mistake.
The only other sound's the sweep
Of easy wind and downy flake.

The woods are lovely, dark, and deep,
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep.

Interpretations of its meaning are endless. Death vs. life. Nature vs. culture. Adultery vs. faithfulness. Freedom/indulgence vs. responsibility/duty. Memory vs. focus. Santa Claus vs. reindeer. Etc.,.

Last year we took the poem up in writing class. The assignment was not to analyze it necessarily, but to describe how transform -- though plot, imagery, tone, etc-- it into first a short story, and then a novel. My transformation from poem to novel was about its form...


Stopping by Robert Frost’s Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening.
Let structure be the guide, the gauge;
Each line into a chapter stage;
A quatrain, thus, maps out a life -
Childhood, youth, parenting, old age.

Each hero flickers full of strife,
Consoles himself, lassoes a wife,
A new rime-child he lights - hurrah!
And dies well-fed like Mack the knife.

As you can see, a-a-b-a,
Will mold this family’s saga;
Four candles, sixteen iambi;
Each life, a semi-Chanukah.

Four lives; the last, do not deny,
Will catch up with the author’s I;
And where it goes, we can’t espy;
And where it goes, we can’t espy.


this is the background image. a crop of bruegel's hunters with some gray gradient to make it pop. Oddly i didn't choose that snowy line to be the equator - it just came out that way

Prospect - article_details: ". The novel, in its fully realised state, exists to reflect on those links between us - on their making and breaking. How can it do that other than through stories? The writer's task, as Margaret Atwood has said, is to make those stories plausible. The only excuse for taking refuge in introspection and irony is meanness and the fear of involvement. Fiction, like life, is no idle stroll. As Flaubert continues in the letter quoted above, 'When I reflect that so much beauty has been entrusted to me - to me - I am so terrified that I am seized with cramps and long to rush off and hide.'"

Prospect - article_details: "Modernism as a movement may not be at fault. The problem is that its initial doctrine - the psychological and linguistic purity pursued by Woolf, Eliot, Pound, Joyce, Wyndham Lewis, Wallace Stevens - rapidly matured into a catastrophic literary self-consciousness. After the 1950s it was more creditable, as a writer of fiction, to be Beckett's or Borges's descendant than Orwell's or Waugh's. Possibly writers were tired of making the effort of linear narrative, possibly they simply wanted to be modern."

Prospect - article_details: "He could have gone further: such narrative patterns, experienced from childhood, have psychological priority over conscious thought, which is why they merge with dreams. Booker's explanation of how plots converge, under headings such as 'Overcoming the Monster' or 'Rags to Riches' or 'Voyage and Return,' is not new"

Except there are non-narratie patterns of thought. And why 'experienced from childhood'? Oftentimes the monsters and demons resided preconsciously.

Independent Enjoyment: "Booker has not contented himself with delineating the seven plots: a book on which, heaven knows, would have been vast and ambitious enough. He goes on to discuss the single underlying theme that unites those plots, and then to consider the whole of human history in its light. This theme is that story is the means by which the collective unconscious calls us sinners to order, to abandon the selfish pursuit of ego in the name of a greater self that accepts a place in the hierarchy of an organic society. In this sort of society, everyone has a place"


test Posted by Hello

Prospect - article_details: "The histories of the novel and of storytelling ran together until the early 20th century; since the 1920s, that history has been one of formal drift, away from the novel as a social form that described how characters live in relation to others, a drift that gathered decisive momentum in the 1970s, as self-consciousness was joined to irony."